ASYMPTOMATIC BACTERIURIA (Screening) IN PREGNANT WOMEN

Evidence Statement Benefit Plan Language Other Information and Resources Author(s)

References


Updated 10/3/11

Evidence Statement

Clinical Preventive Service Recommendations

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture for pregnant women at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation.1

Evidence Rating: A (Strongly Recommended/Good Evidence)
The USPSTF found good evidence that screening pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture significantly reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections, low birth weight, and preterm delivery. The benefits of screening and treatment substantially outweigh any potential harm.1
Evidence-Based Recommendation
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) strongly recommends that all pregnant women be screened for asymptomatic bacteriuria using urine culture at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation or at the first prenatal visit if after that time.2

Evidence Rating: SR (Strongly Recommends)
Good quality evidence exists which demonstrates the substantial net benefit of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria over harm; the intervention is perceived to be cost-effective and acceptable to nearly all patients.2

NOTE:
The USPSTF recommends against routine screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in certain populations. For more information, see D recommendations.


Back to top


The Value of Prevention

Economic Burden of Condition/Disease
Specific data about the economic burden of UTIs among pregnant women are not available. The annual cost of all community-acquired urinary tract infections in 1995 was estimated to be approximately $1.6 billion, including $659 million in direct costs and $936 million in indirect costs.7 The direct and indirect costs of acute pyelonephritis were estimated to be $2.14 billion (in year 2000 dollars).8
Workplace Burden of Condition/Disease
Lost productivity due to absenteeism associated with pregnancy-related complications of UTIs among working women (in addition to the increased medical care costs of such complications) has important financial ramifications for employers. Specific data on the workplace burden of pregnancy-related UTIs are not available.
Economic Benefit of Preventive Intervention
The preventive treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy produces economic benefits such as preventing cases of cystitis, pyelonephritis, and premature births. In addition, preventing cases of mild and serious pyelonephritis produce significant improvements in quality of life.9
Estimated Cost of Preventive Intervention
In 2004, the private-sector cost of screening for bacteriuria averaged $17 per screen; approximately 95% of all paid claims fell within the range of $1 to $45 per screen.10
Estimated Cost of Treatment
One cost-effectiveness study estimated the cost of antibiotic treatment to be $11, based on a 7-day course of the generic form of commonly used antibiotics for the treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (in year 1994 dollars).7

Cost-Effectiveness and/or Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventive Intervention
Research shows that screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria using urine culture, when compared with use of dipstick analysis, is cost-effective among populations where the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria is at least 9%.6

Back to top


Condition / Disease Specific Information

Epidemiology of Condition/Disease
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy is defined at the presence of a significant amount of bacterial growth in a urine culture taken from a urine sample4 and the absence of symptoms of a urinary infection such as pain or urgency.5

Asymptomatic bacteriuria occurs in approximately 2% to 14% of pregnant women and 80,000 to 400,000 cases occur each year in the United States.6

Without treatment, 20% to 40% of asymptomatic bacteriuria cases among pregnant women progress to pyelonephritis, a serious kidney infection. Pyelonephritis complicates 1% to 2% of all pregnancies and affects 100,000 women each year.6 It is also a leading cause of antepartum hospitalization.1 With appropriate screening and treatment, only 3% of bacteriuria cases will progress to pyelonephritis.6
Condition/Disease Risk Factors
Bacteriuria increases the risk for preterm delivery and low birth weight and may also increase the risk of fetal and perinatal mortality.1,6 If fact, the risk of preterm delivery is twice as high among women who had asymptomatic bacteriuria at some point during pregnancy compared to those who did not.6

Risk factors for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy include low socioeconomic urinary tract infections (UTIs) in childhood. Other risk factors include preexisting medical conditions such as diabetes, sickle cell disease, immunosuppression (e.g., HIV/AIDS), urinary tract anatomic anomalies, and spinal cord injuries. UTIs experienced before pregnancy are predictive of the diagnosis of asymptomatic bacteriuria at the first prenatal visit.6

Back to top


Preventive Intervention Information

Preventive Intervention: Purpose of Screening
The purpose of screening for and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy is the prevention of poor maternal and infant outcomes associated with infection including pyelonephritis and prematurity.

Benefits and Risks of Intervention
Good evidence exists that screening pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture (rather than urinalysis) — and treating those with the infection — significantly reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections, low birth weight, and preterm delivery. A urine specimen obtained at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation will detect approximately 80% of patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria.6,11 The USPSTF did not identify any information on the potential harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria.11
Initiation, Cessation, and Interval
All pregnant women should be screened for asymptomatic bacteriuria at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation.1,3 The optimal frequency of subsequent urine testing during pregnancy is uncertain and is thus left to the discretion of the clinician. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that clinicians re-screen all pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria by performing a urine culture during the third trimester.3
Intervention Process
Urine culture is the gold standard for detecting asymptomatic bacteriuria.1 Other types of screening tests commonly used in the primary care setting (such as dipstick analysis and direct microscopy) are not as accurate for detecting bacteriuria in asymptomatic persons.1
Treatment Information
Asymptomatic bacteriuria can be treated with a range of antibiotics. A Cochrane Collaboration review of 14 randomized trials of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women showed that antibiotic treatment was significantly associated with decreased incidence of pyelonephritis. The review also determined that antibiotic treatment reduced the rate of preterm delivery and low birth weight.sup>12

Health benefits should include provisions for diagnostic and treatment services.

Back to top


Strength of Evidence

The level of evidence supporting the recommendations contained in this section is described below.
Evidence-Based Research:
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Strength of Evidence: A (Strongly Recommended/Good Evidence)
  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture for pregnant women at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation.1 The USPSTF found good evidence that screening pregnant women for asymptomatic bacteriuria with urine culture significantly reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections, low birth weight, and preterm delivery. The benefits of screening and treatment substantially outweigh any potential harm.1
The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP)
Strength of Evidence: SR (Strongly Recommended)
  • AAFP strongly recommends that all pregnant women be screened for asymptomatic bacteriuria using urine culture at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation or at the first prenatal visit if after that time. Good quality evidence exists which demonstrates the substantial net benefit of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria over harm; the intervention is perceived to be cost-effective and acceptable to nearly all patients.2

Back to top


Summary Plan Description

Covered Screening
Urine culture
Initiation, Cessation, and Interval
Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria is a covered benefit between 12 and 16 weeks' gestation for all pregnant women. Subsequent screenings are covered, as medically indicated.

Back to top


CPT Codes

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria (Screening)
87077 Culture, bacterial; aerobic isolate, additional methods required for definitive identification, each isolate
87086 Culture, bacterial; quantitative colony count, urine
87088 Culture, bacterial; with isolation and presumptive identification of isolates, urine
87187 Susceptibility studies, antimicrobial agent; microdilution or agar dilution, minimum lethal concentration (MLC), each plate

Back to top


Other Information and Resources

The Cochran Collaboration

Back to top


Author(s)

Campbell KP, Chattopadhyay S. Asymptomatic bacteriuria evidence-statement: screening. In: Campbell KP, Lanza A, Dixon R, Chattopadhyay S, Molinari N, Finch RA, editors. A Purchaser's Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage. Washington, DC: National Business Group on Health; 2006. Updated 2011.

Back to top


References

  1. Calogne N; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria: Recommendation statement. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0551-A. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.
  2. American Academy of Family Physicians. Summary of policy recommendations for periodic health examinations. AAFP Policy Action. Revision 6.0; August 2005.
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antimicrobial therapy for obstetric patients. ACOG educational bulletin no. 245 (8-10). Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; March 1998.
  4. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Medical Encyclopedia: Asymptomatic bacteriuria. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health; [cited 2006 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000520.htm.
  5. Sescor NIC, Garingala-Molina FD, Ycasiano CEJ, Saniel MC, Manalastas RM. Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and associated risk factors in pregnant women. Philippines Journal of Microbial Disease 2003; 32(2): 63-69.
  6. Mittal P, Wing DA. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Clin Perinatol 2005; 32: 749-764.
  7. Rouse DJ, Andrews WW, Goldenberg RL, Owen J. Screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy to prevent pyelonephritis: a cost-effectiveness and cost benefit analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86:119-123.
  8. Brown P, Ki M, Foxman B. Acute pyelonephritis among adults: cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of therapy. Pharmacoeconomics 2005;23:1123-42.
  9. Yen Zui-Shen, davis MA, Chen Shyr-Chyr, Chen Wen-Jone. A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment strategies for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 309-314.
  10. Thomson Medstat. Marketscan. 2004.
  11. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria: Recommendation statement. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. 3rd ed. Rockville, MD; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2001 [cited 2006 Mar 22]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/asymbac/asymbacrs.htm.
  12. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria: A brief evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 05-551-B. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004.