ALCOHOL MISUSE (Screening and Counseling)
Evidence Statement
References |
Updated 1/31/11
Evidence StatementClinical Preventive Service RecommendationsU.S. Preventive Services Task Force RecommendationThe U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce alcohol misuse by adults, including pregnant women, in primary care settings.1Evidence Rating: B (Recommended/At Least Fair Evidence) The evidence on the effectiveness of counseling to reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy is limited; however, studies in the general adult population show that behavioral counseling interventions are effective among women of childbearing age. The USPSTF concluded that the benefits of behavioral counseling interventions to reduce alcohol misuse by adults outweigh any potential harms.1 The USPSTF recommendation is supported by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP).2 Information SourcesThe recommendations and supporting information contained in this document came from several sources, including the:
Condition / Disease Specific InformationEpidemiology of Condition/DiseaseNo amount of alcohol can be considered safe during pregnancy: alcohol consumed during any stage of pregnancy increases the risk of alcohol-related birth defects.3 Fetal exposure to alcohol during pregnancy is one of the leading causes of preventable birth defects, mental retardation, and developmental disorders in the United States.4Despite the documented risks associated with fetal alcohol exposure 10% of pregnant women reported consuming alcohol in 2003.5 Annually, 55% of women of childbearing age report alcohol use, and 12% report binge drinking.5 This statistic is of particular concern because half of all pregnancies in the United States are unplanned and are at particular risk of unintentional prenatal alcohol exposure. Therefore, experts recommend that women of childbearing age consult their physicians and take steps to reduce the possibility of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy by either 1) using an effective form of contraception or 2) reducing or eliminating alcohol use.5 Prenatal alcohol use can lead to one or more fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). FASD is characterized by permanent disabilities of varying degrees of severity. FASD may result in subtle defects, such as learning disabilities or mild physical abnormalities, or it may result in fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), the most severe form of FASD, which is characterized by mental retardation, abnormal facial features, growth retardation, and central nervous system complications.3 FASD is identified in 2 of every 1,000 live births, and FAS is identified in between 0.5 to 2 of every 1,000 live births.3 Because many alcohol-related deficits are not identified at the time of birth, the actual prevalence of alcohol-related disorders is much higher. In fact, researchers estimate that, for every case of FAS documented at birth, there are 3 additional cases that are not identified until later in life.3 Condition/Disease Risk FactorsAlcohol misuse (in the form of binge drinking, heavy drinking, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence) before pregnancy is highly predictive of continued use.4The Value of PreventionEconomic Burden of Condition/DiseaseThe direct and indirect costs of alcohol misuse in the United States were estimated to equal nearly $185 billion in 1998. Medical consequences of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) accounted for about $2.9 billion of this amount and approximately $1.3 billion were attributed to lost earnings due to FAS.6Workplace Burden of Condition/DiseaseData are limited about presenteeism and absenteeism stemming from parental caregiving requirements for FASD/FAS-affected children, but parents are likely to take time off from work to attend to special needs children.Economic Benefit of Preventive InterventionThe economic benefits of screening and counseling mainly result from:
Estimated Cost of Preventive InterventionScreening patients for alcohol misuse in primary care settings is relatively inexpensive. The cost of follow-up counseling sessions depends on the number of sessions, their mode of delivery (in-office or by telephone), and on the type of provider who delivers the counseling. In 2004, the private-sector cost of the initial health risk assessment and counseling averaged $23; approximately 95% of all paid claims fell within the range of $0 to $81.7Estimated Cost of TreatmentTreatment costs for pregnant women who misuse alcohol should not differ from general alcohol treatment costs unless there are other pregnancy-related complications.Cost-Effectiveness and/or Cost-Benefit Analysis of Preventive InterventionScreening and counseling for alcohol misuse have a greater impact and are more cost-effective than most clinical preventive services.8 Screening and counseling for alcohol misuse among all adults (not just pregnant women) reduce both societal and healthcare costs. It is estimated that each $1 invested in screening and brief counseling interventions saves approximately $4 in healthcare costs.9-10 Furthermore, researchers estimated that the excess medical costs for a child with fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) are $2,342 per year (based on North Dakota Health Claims data for 1996 and 1997). This suggests that a alcohol-reduction program that costs $50,000 and is able to prevent one case of FAS each year would have paid for itself in 6 years by generating healthcare savings. The benefits are returned even faster if the prevention of alcohol-related conditions other than FAS are included in the analysis.11Preventive Intervention InformationPreventive Intervention: Purpose of Screening and CounselingScreening for alcohol misuse allows clinicians to identify women who misuse alcohol early in the course of pregnancy (or during the pre- or interconception periods). Pregnant women who misuse alcohol can be counseled to reduce or eliminate their use and referred to treatment services as needed.Benefits and Risks of InterventionThe benefits of screening and intervention include the prevention of FASD and FAS in addition to the maternal benefits accrued from identifying and intervening with their alcohol misuse. Randomized trials demonstrate that brief counseling leads to reduced alcohol consumption among excessive drinkers and to reductions in adverse alcohol-related health outcomes, including excess mortality.9,12-13 The USPSTF found little direct evidence regarding harms of screening for alcohol misuse or behavioral counseling interventions to reduce or eliminate alcohol use in general populations.14Initiation, Cessation, and Interval of ScreeningAll women should be screened for alcohol use with each pregnancy. Because the optimal frequency of screening is unknown, screening is left to the discretion of the clinician. Patients at greater risk for alcohol problems, either because they have a history of past alcohol misuse or may report other risky behaviors, may benefit from re-screening during pregnancy.14 Counseling should be conducted as medically indicated. A total of 8 counseling sessions are covered each calendar year.Intervention ProcessScreeningThere are several effective screening tools currently available for assessing alcohol use in primary care settings. Non-pregnant women of childbearing age seen in primary care settings should be screened with general tools such as a single questions screen (e.g., AUDIT or AUDIT-C).15 Pregnant women seen in primary care settings should be screened with a pregnancy-specific tool such as the TWEAK or T-ACE. The TWEAK, a 5-question tool, and the T-ACE, a 4-question tool, were specifically designed to screen pregnant women for "risky drinking", "harmful drinking", and alcohol abuse disorders. The T-ACE is very sensitive and has been shown to outperform unaided clinicians in identifying pregnant women who use alcohol. All pregnant women and women considering pregnancy should be advised of the harmful effects of alcohol on the fetus. Because safe levels of alcohol consumption during pregnancy are unknown, pregnant women should be advised to refrain from drinking alcohol altogether.5,14 Non pregnant women should also be advised to use contraception until their drinking can be reduced or eliminated. Counseling Clinicians should provide counseling interventions for patients who meet the criteria for alcohol misuse. The USPSTF identifies 3 levels of counseling intervention, differentiated by level of intensity, for these patients. Multi-contact counseling is more effective than single-contact counseling interventions, but providers should tailor counseling intensity to address individual patient needs. Intensity is determined by the duration of the initial contact and whether any follow-up occurs. "Very brief" interventions last up to 5 minutes and have no follow-up. "Brief" counseling interventions last 15 minutes and have no follow-up. "Multi-contact" interventions include one initial session lasting at least 15 minutes and several follow-up contacts.1 More intensive interventions are typically recommended for those meeting criteria for alcohol dependence. Effective counseling for alcohol misuse in the primary care setting includes feedback, advice, goal setting, and follow-up. Alcohol misuse counseling should follow the counseling framework known as the "5 As"15:
Strength of EvidenceThe level of evidence supporting the recommendations contained in this section is described below.Evidence-Based Research: Summary Plan DescriptionCovered CounselingCounseling for alcohol misuse during pregnancy is a covered benefit. Three levels of counseling are covered:
Initiation, Cessation, and IntervalEight (8) counseling sessions are covered per calendar year. Intervals between counseling sessions are at the discretion of the provider. These covered visits are not intended to supplant mental health or addiction treatment coverage.CPT Codes
Other Information and ResourcesBusiness Group Resource(s)CDC ResourceAuthor(s)Campbell KP, Naimi T, Chattopadhyay S. Alcohol misuse during pregnancy evidence-statement: screening and counseling. In: Campbell KP, Lanza A, Dixon R, Chattopadhyay S, Molinari N, Finch RA, editors. A Purchaser's Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage. Washington, DC: National Business Group on Health; 2006.References1 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for alcohol misuse. Summary of recommendation. Rockville, MD; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2004 [cited 2006 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsdrin.htm.2 American Academy of Family Physicians. Summary of Policy Recommendations for Periodic Health Examinations. AAFP Policy Action. Revision 6.0; August 2005. 3 Carmona R. U.S. Surgeon General advisory on alcohol use in pregnancy. News release Feb 21. 2005. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General: Washington, DC; 2005. 4 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Alcohol use among women of childbearing age - United States, 1991-1999. MMWR 2002; 51(13): 273-276. 5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notice to readers: Surgeon General's advisory on alcohol use in pregnancy. MMWR 2005; 54(09): 229. 6 Harwood H. Updating Estimates of Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Update Methods, and Data: National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 2000. NIH Publication No. 98-4327. 7 Thomson Medstat. Marketscan. 2004. 8 Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2006;31:90-6. 9 Fleming MF, Mundt MP, French MT, Manwell LB, Stauffacher EA, Barry KL. Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers: long-term efficacy and benefit-cost analysis. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care settings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002;26:36-43. 10 Gentilello LM, Ebel BE, Wickizer TM, Salkever DS, Rivara FP. Alcohol interventions for trauma patients treated in emergency departments and hospitals: A cost benefit analysis. Ann Surg 2005;241:541-50. 11 Klug MG. Burd L. Fetal alcohol syndrome prevention: Annual and cumulative cost savings. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2003; 25(6): 763-765. 12 Bertholet N, Daeppen J-B, Fleming M, Burnand B. Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:986-95. 13 Cuijpers P, Riper H, Lemmers L. The effects on mortality of brief interventions for problem drinking: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2004;99:839-45. 14 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. What's new from the USPSTF? Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2004. 15 National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Helping patients who drink too much, a clinician's guide. [cited 2006 Aug 21]. Available from: http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/Practitioner/CliniciansGuide2005/guide.pdf#search=%22NIAAA%20clinician's%20guide%22. | |||||||||||||||


